Quantcast

Redding Today

Saturday, November 23, 2024

Experts alarmed by California’s dwindling reservoirs amid ongoing drought

Webp ctas2vanie7ittjlcixhnmx6q14q

State Senator Brian Dahle, District 1 | Official U.S. Senate headshot

State Senator Brian Dahle, District 1 | Official U.S. Senate headshot

California's water supply system, once capable of sustaining the state through multiple dry years, is now struggling. Almost every reservoir is currently below 50% capacity, with some as low as 10%-26%. Experts are concerned about this situation.

The state has allowed significant amounts of precipitation to flow into the Pacific Ocean over the past two years. As a result, many water districts and cities have started mandatory water rationing measures.

California has not managed its water infrastructure adequately to keep up with population growth. The state receives enough rain and snow to serve its residents and farmland for several years if properly managed. However, inadequate infrastructure and regulations requiring substantial amounts of water to flow directly to the ocean have prevented effective water capture.

The lack of available water also impacts power generation. According to the California Energy Commission, in 2019, water provided 19% of California's power. Lake Oroville's low levels forced the Edward Hyatt Power Plant offline for the first time since it opened in 1967. This plant can generate enough electricity for up to 800,000 homes when at full capacity.

Over the last 25 years, California voters approved more than $27 billion in water resource bonds. Despite this funding, no significant new water storage or conveyance systems have been built during this period. This lack of action has led to ongoing drought conditions, causing cities and farms to undergo substantial rationing and forcing farmers to pull trees from the ground.

Several voter-approved bonds aimed at improving water resources include:

- Proposition 204 (1996): $995 million

- Proposition 13 (2000): $1.97 billion

- Proposition 12 (2000): $2.10 billion

- Proposition 40 (2002): $2.60 billion

- Proposition 1E (2006): $3.44 billion

- Proposition 84 (2006): $5.38 billion

- Proposition 1 (2014): $7.12 billion

- Proposition 68 (2018): $4.1 billion

Proposition 1 was supposed to provide $2.7 billion for water storage but remains largely unspent due to bureaucratic delays on projects like Sites Reservoir.

The Governor has the authority to expedite these projects but has yet to take significant action. If insufficient precipitation occurs this winter, Californians can expect more mandatory rationing and land fallowing next year while climate change continues to be cited as a primary cause.

Improving California's outdated water system is crucial for future growth and economic well-being.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS